What does a Work IQ agent need?
A useful integration needs a defined task, an authenticated user, appropriate workplace information, and a way to evaluate the result. Microsoft's Work IQ API provides several interaction options, including REST, MCP, and A2A. In plain language, these offer different ways for applications and agents to request context or delegate work.
Choose the simplest integration that fits
A web application may need a direct programmatic request, while an assistant may need tool access. Start with the experience your users need and the skills your team can support. Avoid combining several protocols merely because they are available. Record why the chosen route fits the workflow and how it will be maintained.
Design around the user's identity
Microsoft documents delegated authentication for Work IQ API requests: work runs in the signed-in user's context, and application-only authentication is not supported. This matters when designing background processes. Verify the current identity flow and tenant requirements before assuming an agent can operate independently of a user.
Keep the first scenario bounded
For example, prepare an internal project summary from information the user can already access. Show useful source context and ask the person to review the result before sharing it. Test missing documents, conflicting updates, and users with different permissions. Define how the agent responds when it cannot retrieve enough evidence.
Operate the integration as a service
Measure task completion, errors, response time, and usage cost. Assign owners for access changes, support, and evaluation updates. Review logging so it helps diagnose problems without collecting unnecessary sensitive content. When adding actions, check their permission requirements separately from retrieval and include approval for consequential changes.
Specify the information the task actually needs
Begin with a concrete output such as a project handover brief. Identify which questions the brief must answer, who will use it, and which sources can support those answers. This prevents the integration from becoming an unrestricted collection exercise. An agent should request information because it contributes to the assigned task, not because a connection makes it available.
For an illustrative project brief, separate confirmed milestones, unresolved decisions, and the people responsible for next steps. Ask the agent to preserve uncertainty when sources disagree. A recent conversation may describe a proposal rather than an approved change. The reviewer needs that distinction to survive the summary so it does not become an accidental business commitment.
Design a useful review experience
Show the employee the sources supporting important statements and a clear way to correct the draft. Keep the destination of any resulting communication visible. Preparing a brief, saving it, and sharing it are separate operations; approval of one should not silently authorize the others. Design these boundaries in the interface as well as in the application logic.
Test with employees who have different project access. Their outputs should reflect their permitted context without implying that unavailable information does not exist. WTA's AI-native product engineering services connect these integration decisions to a usable application. Where an existing portal needs to accommodate the workflow, platform modernization can address the surrounding experience and systems.
Keep evaluation tied to workplace ambiguity
Build cases that include renamed projects, similar document titles, missing meeting notes, and conflicting updates. Define the expected behavior for each case with the process owner. Sometimes the right result is a question asking which project the employee means. Sometimes it is an incomplete brief that clearly identifies the missing evidence.
Review the agent's final output, not merely whether a request returned successfully. Check whether references actually support the stated conclusion and whether the information is current enough for the task. Track how much editing the employee needs to perform. If the reviewer repeats the original research to establish trust, investigate whether the interface or source selection can make verification easier.
Plan the support and change process
Record the selected integration route and its authentication assumptions in the operating instructions. Test what employees experience when a session expires or a required source becomes unavailable. The application should explain the next useful step rather than leaving the person with an unexplained technical error or an apparently complete answer based on insufficient information.
Assign owners for access requests, application changes, and source quality. Keep diagnostic records focused on investigation needs instead of copying whole conversations unnecessarily. When expanding from summaries to actions, create a fresh acceptance review covering authorization, confirmation, and recovery. Reusing the same workplace context does not make a new action equivalent in consequence to a read-only task.
Frequently asked questions
Can the agent assume access to every company document?
No. Design around the documented identity and permission model, and test the actual experience with representative users. Access to relevant information must be appropriate to the task. A connected integration should not be treated as permission to broaden sharing or expose records that employees would not otherwise be authorized to use.
Is a successful API response enough to approve the workflow?
No. Evaluate whether the resulting brief or action meets the business requirement. Inspect accuracy, source relevance, missing context, and employee review effort. Include failures and ambiguous requests in testing. Technical connectivity is necessary, but it does not demonstrate that the complete employee experience is useful or dependable.
Should an integration use every supported protocol?
No. Choose the simplest route that fits the application and the team's maintenance capabilities. Document why it serves the intended task and what dependencies it creates. Additional integration paths should address a specific requirement; otherwise they can increase implementation and support work without improving the business outcome.
How should new business actions be introduced?
Define each action's purpose, permitted users, approval needs, and recovery behavior before enabling it. Show employees what will change and confirm the actual result. Test interruptions and repeated requests so the application does not create duplicate work. Begin with a bounded audience and expand when operating evidence supports the decision.
Published September 18, 2026. Microsoft Work IQ API overview. Related: Microsoft Work IQ: A Guide for Enterprise Leaders.
Apply this to your workflow
Explore our AI Delivery Pods & Agentic Platforms service, or discuss this challenge with WTA. Share your current process, the systems involved, and the result you want to achieve.
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.png)
.svg){kind=small}
.png)