An application can work today while carrying hidden risks. We inspect one agreed workload and its supporting Azure infrastructure, then explain which changes matter most to the business.
Our review follows the five pillars of the Azure Well-Architected Framework. Sustainability is an additional lens on efficient resource use, rather than a sixth Azure pillar.
These decisions involve tradeoffs. Extra redundancy can improve recovery while increasing cost. We make the assumptions visible so your team can choose deliberately.
Explore the full Well-Architected Framework Review (WAFR) or discuss your requirements with WTA.
It is an evidence-based inspection of an agreed cloud workload. WTA reviews architecture and operating practices against business requirements, then prioritizes improvements across reliability, security, cost, operations, and performance. The output is a practical decision and remediation plan.
Only when implementation is included in the agreed scope. The assessment identifies and prioritizes changes. Remediation, retesting, and ongoing support can be commissioned separately or included as defined deliverables, with ownership and acceptance criteria agreed before work begins.
Yes. We agree on appropriate access and evidence collection with your team. Architecture documents, configuration exports, monitoring, spending records, and stakeholder discussions can support the review. Production changes and disruptive tests require a separately agreed plan.
A cloud architecture review examines how an existing workload is designed and operated. AI readiness examines whether a particular AI initiative has the business case, data, systems, people, and controls needed to proceed. The assessments can inform one another.
.svg){kind=small}
.png)
